As most college students do, I was strolling through my
social media accounts, updating myself on the lives of others around me and the
general world. Facebook tends to be one of the first websites I go to when I
start my routine. A couple days ago, one of my Facebook friends shared a video
that I found really interesting. The video was recorded in Barbados at Burke’s
Beach. What makes the video intriguing is that hundreds of dolphin had swam up
to the shore, not realizing that they were pretty much on the land. Several of
them got stuck on the shoreline and couldn’t get back in the water. The
reaction of those at the beach was startling to me. Everyone immediately jumped
in to rescue the dolphins. Those who didn’t physically get in contact with the
animal yelled out ways to get the dolphins back in the water. It was amazing to
see the team effort that was put into saving the animals. The link to the video
is as followed: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10151838587417813&fref=nf . Please take a minute or two to watch the
video. It will give you a better understanding of the story that I am trying to
tell. Saving the dolphins was clearly an act that stemmed from environmentalism.
After watching the video, I immediately related it to some of the ideas brought
up in class. This post will explore the origins of environmentalism, evaluating
whether it branched solely from colonialism or whether it was came out of
religious ideas and morals.
Author of Ecological
Imperialism, Alfred Crosby, shares with us an idea behind why the western
world’s culture is more European driven than anything else. He explains that
the earth’s latitude is at the core of colonialism. According to him, Europeans
migrated to areas that were attractive to them because they were able to
survive there. As a result, during the early 1800s there was a large movement
of Europeans to the West. When they migrated here, they brought with them their
culture, practices and way of life. They would sow the same crops, speak their
native language, and practice the religion that they have practiced for
centuries. With all the transfer of knowledge that occurred during this time,
there is no doubt in my mind the ideas of environmentalism was spread
throughout the world through colonialism. Author of Green Imperialism, Richard
Grove makes it clear that environmentalism is not a new concept. In fact, there
were forest conservation policies in British colonial States. Conservation is
the act of preventing deterioration. Over time there has been a growing
understanding of the relationship between man and the earth, particularly the
idea of conservation. Colonialism promoted the rapid growth of scientific
ideas. With this growth came an understanding of how the world works. This
eventually led to environmentalism because people are now able to connect the
state of their environment with their actions. With all of this being said,
colonialism could be viewed as the start of environmentalism, especially in the
New World.
Though colonialism seems
like the start of the environmental movement, other factors may have played a
major part. Religion, which is defined as a particular system of faith and
worship, may also be the catalyst of environmentalism. In the 1400s,
Christopher Columbus made several voyages to the New World. Here he came into
contact with the Native Americans. The Europeans labeled these people as
uncivilized. They did not acknowledge their way of life as one that was sophisticated
enough, and therefore inferior to theirs. This included their language as well
as their faith. As a result, the Europeans took it upon themselves to bring
some type of “civilization” to these people. They educated the Natives on
European languages, introduced them to European trinkets and exchanged religion
with them for gold. Religion is a very important aspect in molding the ethics
and moral of people, though one can be ethical without religion. At the time,
Europeans were mainly Christian. In the Christian faith, the belief is that god
made the world and that we should have a sense of care for what he has provided
us. Care for the environment is the main argument of environmentalism. When the
Europeans brought their religion to the West, they may have brought with them
the ideas of environmentalism, which has evolved into a widely known movement
today.
It is hard to distinguish between
whether colonialism or religion, two things that helped shape the world that we
live in today, started the environmental movement. However, I know that they
both played a role somehow. Religion to me is the obvious start of the ideas
that created environmentalism. It was here before scientific discoveries were
here, which was way before colonialism. It created the idea of conserving what
god has given to us and using our resources wisely. It helped to create a sense
of what is right and what is wrong. When the Europeans moved to the New World
they brought their religion with them, hence, bringing the ideas of conservationism
with them. This ideas were then shared with the people that were already
present here. As a result, colonialism had an effect on the spread of the
environmental movement. Today, these ideas have been ingrained so deeply into
society that the people at Burke’s Beach, Barbados, found it necessary to help
pull the dolphins back into the ocean. This was only the “right” thing to do.
Is it environmentalism that drove the beach goers to help the dolphins or a connections with them as living species/mammals. Maybe I should even as if there is a difference between empathy towards another species and environmentalism?
ReplyDeleteI disagree that religion "created" the environmental movement. I think "inspired" an environmental movement is the more accurate circumstance. Environmentalism existed before the colonials came to the new world, and it could be argued that the Native Americans practiced environmentalism pre-Columbus, especially when you compare their lifestyle to the lifestyles of Europeans of the same time period.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Noah. To say that religion took part in creating the environmental movement is a bit of a stretch. But I do agree that it played apart along with many other factors.
DeleteReligion, separate from environmentalism, helped to create a sense of morality. This may have influenced the beach goers to protect the dolphins. The dolphins being a living species further influenced people's want to protect them especially because this is something religion preachers. On the other hand, some people, who are less religious, may have wanted to save the dolphins because they believe in the idea of environmentalism and the need to protect animal life.
ReplyDelete