The Resource Curse: Making the poor even poorer
The resource curse that
has plagued developing countries throughout history is a constant threat
whenever valuable resources are found. Many authors, such as Michael Ross,
argue that the curse itself stems as a result of irresponsible governments and
poor financial decisions. While these are true, they point to a bigger issue
that seems to be at the heart of the resource curse. These countries that
experience financial and political collapse as a result of discovering valuable
resources always classified as “developing.” Rarely is there a scenario in
which an independent, developed nation discovers a substance of value and the
results are devastating. Usually, the opposite happens, and the economy
flourishes.
The issue, therefore, is that valuable substances are a
curse that make poor nations even poorer. Like Africa has seen time after time,
with rubber, oil, gold, and diamonds, an unstable or nonexistent government cannot
be an effective actor. The combination of valuable resources and unstable
governments is something that begs for a solution, but unfortunately, a
solution is not likely to arrive. The natural resources that are found in a
nation are the sole property of that nation. Therefore, we cannot simply take
away the natural resources of these nations to avoid economic trouble. As for
telling other governments how to function and use the natural resources, that
can only work as far as they are willing to take the advice of others. More
often than not, the leaders of a developing nation will exploit all the resources
for their own benefit until the resource runs dry, the economy collapses, or
both. It is impossible for an international agency or entity to plan for the
discovery of a valuable resource, therefore we cannot simply expect an issue
and deal with it accordingly.
The best approach to resolving, or at least remedying
this issue is through a series of long term actions that would hopefully allow
these developing nations to make intelligent decisions that will benefit that
common people which, in turn, will benefit the governments. First, there should
be international advisors to nations struggling with resource management. If a
nation is on the verge of collapse, or even on the verge on discovering and
exploiting a resource, someone should be there to act as a sort of financial advisor.
Educating these developing nations is the first step towards a solution.
The next remedy solution, which
is essentially an ultimate solution for any nation, is to promote democracy in
the region, hopefully sparking the movement towards more democratic nations. Mitchell’s
Carbon Democracy hits the nail on the
head with describing the only legitimate solution to ending the tragedy that
befalls on poor nations that stumble upon sudden wealth. With such a divide
between developed and developing nations, there are really only two options for
what can occur as a result of such a discovery: economic success or civil war. It
is ultimately a choice that must be made by the developing nations themselves.
They can either ignore the signs from the past and take advantage of an
opportunity, or they can exploit their land and devastate their country.
I totally agree with your assertion that education is important in the long term. However, sending advisors to developing countries may not be the best way to educate those population. i think a much more effective way to educate these populations would be to educate some number of them in the West, where educational infrastructure is the best and then when they return to their native country, they reiterate what they learned. This could prevent many of the trust problems that may come with using advisers.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good point, and I think that your idea would also help to move newer generations away from traditional practices and into the modern way of thinking.
DeleteI agree to a certain extent with educating the developing countries to save their economies from collapsing when they find new natural materials. On the one hand, this is needed. If they do not know, and have had their economies collapse before, they need to be informed so they do not repeat their mistakes that they previously performed. Yet, as we've seen, informing these third world countries turns into colonizing them to take on all of a certain countries practices that they see fit. As long as it does not go as far as trying to make a country revert its culture and assimilate to what they see as effective for the environment, but inform them so they can make their own decisions that will work for them and their culture, I think it would be the most beneficial assistance to developing countries.
ReplyDeleteI agree that education is crucial in the long term to a country's government improving their regulation of the extraction and sales of natural resources. Typically, the central government in these countries are not as stable as a developed nations which means that having an international advisor aid the central government might not be as effective as using a more localized approach. The smaller regional governments and local citizens provide the regulation and labor, respectively, for the industries of these natural resources. Could having a core of economic advisors working with the local governments lead to more effective improvement of the regulation of natural resources? As Noah stated, the ideal advisors would be natives who have trained in the western education system. Utilizing advisors such as this would help avoid the cultural and social stigmas about western intervention. The international community could provide opportunities for young citizens of these countries to attend western universities to study economic and community engagement. When the individuals return home, they could educate their communities and utilize the new skills to improve the regulation of natural resources.
ReplyDelete