In class we have been
discussing the climate change efforts that have been attempted globally and
they have all failed for the most part. Partly, because countries cannot come
to a solid agreement of what needs to be accomplished and how to go about it. There
are plenty of other questions at hand but one that I think would bring
countries together to come to a compromise to move forward with climate change
efforts is whether it is being justified as a national security threat or not.
According to the article we needed to read on americansecurityproject.org,
about 70% of the globe considers climate change as a national security threat. By
finding a common ground by establishing that most nations have the same idea
that it is a national security individually, this could possibly be the
foundation for them to form a unity to begin enacting efforts to battle climate
change globally.
Progress has not been able to be accomplished or even
started because there have always been conflicts between countries as to what
methods would work for the whole globe, how much each nation should contribute
and on what basis, along with many other factors; none of which could be agreed
on. But with more countries looking at the long term effects that are creeping
closer as time goes on, more nations are seeing how climate change will heavily
impact many things that help their country thrive like the infrastructure, the
land where crops are grown, and the ships that come into port on nations
shores. Not only does climate change impact the nation itself but it also
impacts the relationships that nations have with each other across the globe.
Climate change that impact nation’s environments in a way
that would drastically diminish the growth of crops due to too much rainfall or
severe droughts can hurt the economy of a nation that will prove to be
difficult to bounce back from. There is also the problem of shore erosion that
could hinder ships from docking in ports to transport imports. If countries are
unable to export or import products, that not only damages their nations
society and makes resources scarce and more expensive, but it does the same for
the nation that will be lacking the exports it would be receiving. And if the
infrastructures are damaged, that would delay how quickly resources can be
exported or utilized within the country can lead to bigger issues over time.
As these issues become more of a reality rather than a
possibility, it is imperative for countries to figure out a compromise that
will work for everyone or allow everyone to find a solution that works best for
their country and work toward a mutually agreed upon end goal. By seeing
climate change as a national security threat to many nations, and them building
a comradery off of this basis, actions could be made with the interest of the
whole globe instead of everyone’s individual national interest at the forefront
of handling the impact of climate change.
I am not so sure that climate change can be made into a national security issue, as far as its importance would be on par with the importance of issues like war. Maybe it could be a national security issue with the caveat that it is less important, or at least less pressing, than other national security issues.
ReplyDeleteClimate could be made a national security issue for some countries but not for all. At least it does not appear to me that way, based n my understanding of what national security is. Countries like the US who may not directly feel a negative impact from the changing climate might be less open to viewing it as a national security problem.
ReplyDeleteClimate change is an issue that affects every nation on our planet. However, I don't believe that every nation recognizes it as an issue, and moreover, considers it an issue worth addressing. I don't think climate change can become a national security issue in certain groups of countries such as developing nations who are not directly effected by climate change. These nations consider economic productivity and increasing development to be more important than lowering global temperatures. The benefits to these nations reaped from increasing resource use to improve their nation is not worth the slowed development that would result from limiting themselves in order to effect temperature increases. I don't think its realistic for this group of nations to consider climate change a national security issue until it directly effects them.
ReplyDelete